Chimeric immunoreceptor useful in treating human cancers

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to chimeric transmembrane immunoreceptors, named “zetakines,” comprised of an extracellular domain comprising a soluble receptor ligand linked to a support region capable of tethering the extracellular domain to a cell surface, a transmembrane region and an intracellular signalling domain. Zetakines, when expressed on the surface of T lymphocytes, direct T cell activity to those specific cells expressing a receptor for which the soluble receptor ligand is specific. Zetakine chimeric immunoreceptors represent a novel extension of antibody-based immunoreceptors for redirecting the antigen specificity of T cells, with application to treatment of a variety of cancers, particularly via the autocrin/paracrine cytokine systems utilized by human maligancy. In a preferred embodiment is a glioma-specific immunoreceptor comprising the extracellular targetting domain of the IL-13Rα2-specific IL-13 mutant IL-13(E13Y) linked to the Fc region of IgG, the transmembrane domain of human CD4, and the human CD3 zeta chain.

This application is a continuation of prior co-pending application Ser.No. 13/046,518, filed Mar. 11, 2011, which is a continuation of priorco-pending application Ser. No. 12/314,195, filed Dec. 5, 2008, nowabandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No.11/274,344, filed Nov. 16, 2005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,514,537), which isa continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/134,645, filedApr. 30, 2002, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of U.S.provisional application Ser. No. 60/286,981, filed Apr. 30, 2001.Application Ser. No. 12/314,195 also claims the benefit of U.S.provisional application Ser. No. 61/091,915, filed Aug. 26, 2008. Thedisclosures of all of the above applications are hereby incorporated byreference in their entirety.

This invention was made with government support in the form of CancerCenter Support Grant no. P30-CA33572-21 from the United StatesDepartment of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.The United States government has certain rights in the invention.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to the field of biomedicine and specificallymethods useful for cancer therapy. In particular, embodiments of theinvention relate to methods for specific CTL immunotherapeuticstrategies for cancer including the use of genetically-modified Tlymphocytes expressing chimeric immunoreceptors in the treatment ofhuman brain tumors and other cancers.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Primary brain tumors are the third leading contributor to cancer-relatedmortality in young adults, are the second leading contributor inchildren, and appear to be increasing in incidence both in the pediatricand geriatric population¹⁻⁴. Gliomas are the most common type of primarybrain tumors; 20,000 cases are diagnosed and 14,000 glioma-relateddeaths occur annually in the United States⁵⁻⁸. Gliomas are heterogeneouswith respect to their malignant behavior and, in their most common andaggressive forms, anaplastic astrocytoma (AA-grade III) and glioblastomamultiforme (GBM-grade IV), are rapidly progressive and nearly uniformlylethal^(9; 10). Currently available therapeutic modalities have minimalcurative potential for these high-grade tumors and often exacerbate thealready severe morbidities imposed by their location in the centralnervous system. Thus patients with malignant glioma are often struck inthe most productive period of their lives; frequent deterioration ofmental faculties and a high case:fatality ratio contribute to the uniquepersonal and social impact of these tumors.

The cornerstones of oncologic management of malignant glioma areresection and radiation therapy¹¹⁻¹⁶. With modern surgical andradiotherapeutic techniques the mean duration of survival has increasedto 82 weeks for glioblastoma multiforme and 275 weeks for anaplasticastrocytoma, although 5-year survival rates have only increased from 3to 6% for glioblastoma multiforme and 12.1% for anaplasticastrocytoma⁶⁻⁸. The major prognostic indicators for prolonged survivalare younger age (<40 yrs) and performance status (KPS score >70)¹⁷.Resections of >90% of bulky tumors are usually attempted provided thatvital functional anatomy is spared. When used in conjunction withpost-operative radiation therapy, the impact of extent of resection onduration of survival is less clear^(18; 19). The addition ofchemotherapy to resection and radiation provides only marginal survivaladvantage to patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastomamultiforme²⁰⁻²³. Nitrosureas alone or in combination with procarbazineand vincristine are the conventional drugs used in the community andappear to improve the 1-year and 2-year survival rates by 15% withoutimpacting on the overall median survival^(24; 25). More aggressiveregimens incorporating platinum-based drugs and topoisomerase inhibitorsare under investigation²⁶. The role of high-dose chemotherapy with stemcell rescue has not been substantiated to date²⁷⁻²⁹.

Approximately 80% of recurrent tumors arise from radiographicallyenhancing remnants of the original incompletely resectedtumor^(10; 30; 31). Provided recurrences are unifocal and amenable intheir location to aggressive re-resection, this approach can extendsurvival duration, particularly for patients with anaplastic astrocytomaand those glioblastoma multiforme patients with a KPS>70.¹⁰ The mediansurvival of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme patients treated withre-resection is 36 weeks^(10; 30; 31). Radiation therapy in the form ofeither brachytherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery may extend theduration of survival in re-resected recurrent glioblastoma multiformepatients by only 10-12 weeks³². The use of chemotherapy in the settingof recurrent disease should be in the context of available clinicaltrials, as its efficacy in this patient population is unsubstantiated.

The continued dismal prognosis of malignant glioma has prompted theclinical investigation of novel therapeutic entities, including, but notlimited to: gene therapy (TK-suicide, antisense inhibition of tumorgrowth factor receptors, conditionally lethal viral vectors),immunotherapy (antibody, tumor cell vaccines, immunotoxins, adoptivetransfer of activated lymphocytes), and anti-angiogenesisapproaches³³⁻⁴⁰. The multiplicity of challenges faced in the developmentof effective adjuvant therapies for malignant glioma include theextensive infiltrative growth of tumor cells into normal brainparenchyma, the capacity of soluble factors elaborated from these tumorsto attenuate the development of immune responses, and the difficulty ofestablishing clinically meaningful therapeutic ratios when administeringtherapeutics into the central nervous system (CNS). Early clinicalevaluation of novel therapeutics is clearly indicated in this patientpopulation.

Recently, receptors for transferrin and growth factors have been thesubject of experimental glioma therapeutics utilizing ligands for thesereceptors conjugated to toxins or radionucleotides as a deliverysystem⁴¹. The specificity of this approach relies on the uniqueexpression or over-expression of targeted receptors on glioma cellscompared to normal brain. Interestingly, some receptor complexes forinterleukins utilized by the immune system are expressed by gliomas, inparticular high-affinity IL-13 receptors⁴²⁻⁴⁸. Unlike the IL-13 receptortrimolecular complex utilized by the immune system, which consists ofthe IL-13Rα1, the IL-4Rβ, and γc, glioma cells overexpress a uniqueIL-13Rα2 chain capable of binding IL-13 independently of the requirementfor IL-4Rβ or γc^(44; 49; 50). Like its homologue IL-4, IL-13 haspleotrophic immunoregulatory activity outside the CNS⁵¹⁻⁵³. Bothcytokines stimulate IgE production by B lymphocytes and suppresspro-inflammatory cytokine production by macrophages. The immunobiologyof IL-13 within the CNS is largely unknown.

Detailed studies by Debinski et al. using autoradiography withradiolabeled IL-13 have demonstrated abundant IL-13 binding on nearlyall malignant glioma tissues studied^(42; 45; 46; 48). Moreover, thebinding is highly homogeneous within tumor sections and from single cellanalysis^(46; 48). Scatchard analyses of IL-13 binding to human gliomacell lines reveals on average 17,000-28,000 binding sites/cell⁴⁵.Molecular analysis using probes specific for IL-13Rα2 mRNA fail todemonstrate expression of the glioma-specific receptor by normal brainelements in all CNS anatomic locations^(42; 43). Furthermore,autoradiography with radiolabeled IL-13 failed to demonstrate detectablespecific IL-13 binding in the CNS, suggesting that the sharedIL13Rα1/IL-4β/γc receptor is also not expressed at detectable levels inthe CNS⁴⁶. These findings were independently verified usingimmunohistochemical techniques on non-pathologic brain sections withantibodies specific for IL-13Rα1 and IL-4β⁵⁴. Thus IL-13Rα2 stands asthe most specific and ubiquitously expressed cell-surface target forglioma described to date.

As a strategy to exploit the glioma-specific expression of IL-13Rα2 inthe CNS, molecular constructs of the IL-13 cytokine have been describedthat fuse various cytotoxins (Pseudomonas exotoxin and Diptheria toxin)to its carboxyl terminal⁵⁵⁻⁵⁸.

Internalization of these toxins upon binding to IL-13 receptors is thebasis of the selective toxicity of these fusion proteins. These toxinsdisplay potent cytotoxicity towards glioma cells in vitro at picomolarconcentrations⁵⁵. Human intracranial glioma xenografts inimmunodeficient mice can be eliminated by intratumor injection of theIL-13-toxin fusion protein without observed toxicities⁵⁵. These studiessupport the initiation of clinical investigation utilizingIL-13-directed immunotoxins loco-regionally for malignant glioma.

However, the binding of IL-13-based cytotoxins to the broadly expressedIL-13Rα1/IL-4β/γc receptor complex has the potential of mediatinguntoward toxicities to normal tissues outside the CNS, and thus limitsthe systemic administration of these agents. IL-13 has been extensivelydissected at the molecular level: structural domains of this cytokinethat are important for associating with individual receptor subunitshave been mapped^(55; 58). Consequently, selected amino acidsubstitutions in IL-13 have predictable effects on the association ofthis cytokine with its receptor subunits. Amino acid substitutions inIL-13's alpha helix A, in particular at amino acid 13, disrupt itsability to associate with IL-4β, thereby selectively reducing theaffinity of IL-13 to the IL-13Rα1/IL-4β/γc receptor by a factor offive^(55; 57; 58). Surprisingly, binding of mutant IL-13(E13Y) toIL-13Rα2 was not only preserved but increased relative to wild-typeIL-13 by 50-fold. Thus, minimally altered IL-13 analogs cansimultaneously increase IL-13's specificity and affinity for gliomacells via selective binding to IL-13Rα2 relative to normal tissuesbearing IL-13Rα1/IL-4β/γc receptors.

Malignant gliomas represent a clinical entity that is highly attractivefor immunotherapeutic intervention since 1) most patients with resectionand radiation therapy achieve a state of minimal disease burden and 2)the anatomic location of these tumors within the confines of the CNSmake direct loco-regional administration of effector cells possible. Atleast two pathologic studies have demonstrated that the extent ofperivascular lymphocytic infiltration in malignant gliomas correlateswith an improved prognosis⁵⁹⁻⁶¹. Animal model systems have establishedthat glioma-specific T cells, but not lymphokine-activated killer (LAK)cells, can mediate the regression of intracerebrally implantedgliomas⁶²⁻⁷¹. T cells, unlike LAK cells, have the capacity to infiltrateinto brain parenchyma and thus can target infiltrating tumor cells thatmay be distant from the primary tumor. Despite these findings, there isa substantial body of evidence that gliomas actively subvert immunedestruction, primarily by the elaboration of immunosuppressive cytokines(TGF-β2) and prostaglandins, which, inhibit the induction/amplificationof glioma-reactive T cell responses⁷²⁻⁷⁴. These findings have promptedthe evaluation of ex vivo expanded anti-glioma effector cells foradoptive therapy as a strategy to overcome tumor-mediated limitations ofgenerating responses in vivo.

At least ten pilot studies involving the administration of ex vivoactivated lymphocytes to malignant glioma resection cavities have beenreported to date⁷⁵⁻⁸⁵. Despite the variety of effector cell types (LAK,TILS, alloreactive CTLs), their heterogeneous composition/variability ofcomposition from patient to patient, and the often modest in vitroreactivity of these effector cells towards glioma targets, thesestudies, in aggregate, report an approximate 50% response rate inpatients with recurrent/refractory disease with anecdotal long-termsurvivors. These studies support the premise that a superior clinicaleffect of cellular immunotherapy for glioma might be expected withhomogenous highly potent effector cells.

These pilot studies also report on the safety and tolerability of directadministration of ex vivo activated lymphocytes and interleukin-2(IL-2), a T cell growth factor, into the resection cavity of patientswith malignant glioma^(75; 76; 78; 82; 86-92). Even at large individualcell doses (>10⁹ cells/dose), as well as high cumulative cell doses(>27×10⁹ cells), toxicities are modest, and typically consist of gradeII or less transient headache, nausea, vomiting and fever. As notedabove, these studies also employed the co-administration of rhIL-2 tosupport the in vivo survival of transferred lymphocytes. Multiple dosesgiven either concurrently with lymphocytes or sequentially afterlymphocyte administration were tolerated at doses as high as 1.2×10⁶IU/dose for 12-dose courses of IL-2 delivered every 48-hours.

Based on the findings outlined above, strategies to improve theanti-tumor potency of lymphocyte effector cells used in gliomaimmunotherapy are under development. One approach utilizes bi-specificantibodies capable of co-localizing and activating T lymphocytes via ananti-CD3 domain with glioma targets utilizing an epidermal growth factorreceptor (EGFR) binding domain⁹³⁻⁹⁶. Preliminary clinical experiencewith this bi-specific antibody in combination with autologouslymphocytes suggests that T cells are activated in situ in the resectioncavity. Targeting infiltrating tumor cells within the brain parenchyma,however, is a potentially significant limitation of this approach. Tcells might have significantly increased anti-glioma activity if theyare specific for target antigens expressed by gliomas. A growing numberof human genes encoding tumor antigens to which T lymphocytes arereactive have been cloned, including the SART-1 gene, which appears tobe expressed by nearly 75% of high-grade gliomas⁹⁷. Both dendriticcell-based in vitro cell culture techniques, as well as tetramer-based Tcell selection technologies are making feasible the isolation ofantigen-specific T cells for adoptive therapy. Since antigens likeSART-1 are recognized by T cells in the context of restricting HLAalleles, antigen-specific approaches will require substantial expansionin the number of antigens and restricting HLA alleles capable ofpresenting these antigens to be broadly applicable to the generalpopulation of glioma patients.

Chimeric antigen receptors engineered to consist of an extracellularsingle chain antibody (scFvFc) fused to the intracellular signalingdomain of the T cell antigen receptor complex zeta chain (scFvFc:ζ) havethe ability, when expressed in T cells, to redirect antigen recognitionbased on the monoclonal antibody's specificity⁹⁸. The design of scFvFc:ζreceptors with target specificities for tumor cell-surface epitopes is aconceptually attractive strategy to generate antitumor immune effectorcells for adoptive therapy as it does not rely on pre-existinganti-tumor immunity. These receptors are “universal” in that they bindantigen in a MHC independent fashion, thus, one receptor construct canbe used to treat a population of patients with antigen-positive tumors.Several constructs for targeting human tumors have been described in theliterature including receptors with specificities for Her2/Neu, CEA,ERRB-2, CD44v6, and epitopes selectively expressed on renal cellcarcinoma⁹⁸⁻¹⁰⁴. These epitopes all share the common characteristic ofbeing cell-surface moieties accessible to scFv binding by the chimeric Tcell receptor. In vitro studies have demonstrated that both CD4+ andCD8+ T cell effector functions can be triggered via these receptors.Moreover, animal models have demonstrated the capacity of adoptivelytransferred scFvFc:ζ expressing T cells to eradicate establishedtumors¹⁰⁵. The function of primary human T cells expressingtumor-specific scFvFc:ζ receptors have been evaluated in vitro; thesecells specifically lyse tumor targets and secrete an array ofpro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-2, TNF, IFN-γ, and GM-CSF¹⁰⁴.Phase I pilot adoptive therapy studies are underway utilizing autologousscFvFc:ζ-expressing T cells specific for HIV gp120 in HIV infectedindividuals and autologous scFvFc:ζ-expressing T cells with specificityfor TAG-72 expressed on a variety of adenocarcinomas, including breastand colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Investigators at City of Hope have engineered a CD20-specific scFvFc:ζreceptor construct for the purpose of targeting CD20+ B-cell malignancyand an L1-CAM-specific chimeric immunoreceptor for targetingneuroblastoma¹⁰⁶. Preclinical laboratory studies have demonstrated thefeasibility of isolating and expanding from healthy individuals andlymphoma patients CD8+ CTL clones that contain a single copy ofunrearranged chromosomally integrated vector DNA and express theCD20-specific scFvFc:ζ receptor¹⁰⁷. To accomplish this, purified linearplasmid DNA containing the chimeric receptor sequence under thetranscriptional control of the CMV immediate/early promoter and the NeoRgene under the transcriptional control of the SV40 early promoter wasintroduced into activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells byexposure of cells and DNA to a brief electrical current, a procedurecalled electroporation. Utilizing selection, cloning, and expansionmethods currently employed in FDA-approved clinical trials at the FredHutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash., gene modified CD8+CTL clones with CD20-specific cytolytic activity have been generatedfrom each of six healthy volunteers in 15 separate electroporationprocedures. These clones when co-cultured with a panel of human CD20+lymphoma cell lines proliferate, specifically lyse target cells, and arestimulated to produce cytokines.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to chimeric transmembrane immunoreceptors,named “zetakines,” comprised of an extracellular domain comprising asoluble receptor ligand linked to a support region capable of tetheringthe extracellular domain to a cell surface, a transmembrane region andan intracellular signaling domain. Zetakines, when expressed on thesurface of T lymphocytes, direct T cell activity to those cellsexpressing a receptor for which the soluble receptor ligand is specific.Zetakine chimeric immunoreceptors represent a novel extension ofantibody-based immunoreceptors for redirecting the antigen specificityof T cells, with application to treatment of a variety of cancers,particularly via the autocrine/paracrine cytokine systems utilized byhuman malignancy.

In one preferred embodiment exploiting the tumor-restricted expressionof IL-13Rα2 by malignant glioma and renal cell carcinoma as a target forcellular immunotherapy, a mutant of the IL-13 cytokine, IL-13(E13Y),having selective high-affinity binding to IL-13Rα2 has been convertedinto a type I transmembrane chimeric immunoreceptor capable ofredirecting T cell antigen specificity to IL-13Rα2-expressing tumorcells. This embodiment of the zetakine consists of extracellularIL-13(E13Y) fused to human IgG4 Fc, transmembrane CD4, and intracellularT cell antigen receptor CD3 complex zeta chain. Analogousimmunoreceptors can be created that are specific to any of a variety ofcancer cell types that selectively express receptors on their cellsurfaces, for which selective ligands are known or can be engineered.

Bulk lines and clones of human T cells stably transformed to expresssuch an immunoreceptor display redirected cytolysis of the cancer celltype to which they are specific, while showing negligible toxicitytowards non-target cells. Such engineered T cells are a potent andselective therapy for malignancies, including difficult to treat cancerssuch as glioma.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1: Results of a Western Blot showing that the IL13zetakine ChimericImmunoreceptor is expressed as an intact glycosylated protein in JurkatT cells.

FIG. 2: Results of flow cytometric analyses (FIG. 2A: mouse anti-humanFc; FIG. 2B: anti-human IL13 mAb) showing that expressed IL3zetakinechimeric immunoreceptor trafficks to the cell-surface as a type Itransmembrane protein.

FIG. 3: Results of flow cytometric analysis showing the cell surfacephenotype of a representative primary human IL13zetakine⁺ CTL clone(FIG. 3A: αCD4, αCDB, αTCR; FIG. 3B: αFC; FIG. 3C: αIL13) .

FIG. 4: Results of chromium release assays. FIGS. 4A and 4B show thatthe IL13zetakine⁺ CTL clone acquired glioma-specific re-directedcytolytic activity, and FIGS. 4C, 4D, 4E and 4F show the profile ofanti-glioma cytolytic activity by primary human IL13zetakine⁺ CD8⁺ CTLclones was observed in glioma cells generally.

FIG. 5: Results of in vitro stimulation of cytokine production, showingthat IL13zetakine⁺ CTL clones are activated for cytokine production byglioma stimulator cells (FIG. 5A: IFNγ concentration; FIG. 5B: GM-CSFconcentration; FIG. 5C: TNFα concentration).

FIG. 6: Results of in vitro stimulation of cytokine production (FIG. 6A,IFNγ; FIG. 6B, TNFα; FIG. 6C, GM-CSF), showing the specific inhibitionof IL13zetakine⁺ CTL activation for cytokine production by anti-IL13RMab and rhIL13.

FIG. 7: Results of growth studies. FIG. 7A shows that IL13zetakine⁺ CD8⁺CTL cells proliferate upon co-culture with glioma stimulators, and FIG.7B shows the inhibition of glioma-stimulated proliferation ofIL13zetakine⁺ CD8⁺ CTL cells by rhIL-13.

FIG. 8: Flow chart of the construction of IL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG (FIG.8A, construction of hsp-IL13-IgG4 (SmP)-hinge-Fe-Zeta; FIG. 8B,construction of IL13-Fc;ζ3pMB̂Pac; FIG. 8C, construction ofIL13/HyTK-pMG).

FIG. 9: Plasmid map of IL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG.

FIG. 10: Plasmid map of alternative IL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG.

FIG. 11: Schematic diagram showing structure of IL13 zetakine insert.

FIGS. 12A through 12I: Nucleic acid sequence of a plasmid DNA vector(upper strand: SEQ ID NO:24; lower strand: SEQ ID NO:25) and thecorresponding amino acid sequence of IL13zetakine (SEQ ID NO:17) andHyTK (SEQ ID NO:18).

FIGS. 13A through 13I: Nucleic acid sequence of an alternate plasmid DNAvector (upper strand: SEQ ID NO:19; lower strand: SEQ ID NO:20) and thecorresponding amino acid sequence of IL13zetakine (SEQ ID NO:22) andHyTK (SEQ ID NO:21).

FIGS. 14A through 14C: Nucleic acid sequence of an alternate plasmid DNAvector (SEQ ID NO:23).

FIGS. 15A through 15H: Nucleic acid sequence of an alternate plasma DNAvector (upper strand: SEQ ID NO:14; lower strand: SEQ ID NO:16) and thecorresponding amino and sequence of IL13zetakine (SEQ ID NO:17) and HyTK(SEQ ID NO:18).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An ideal cell-surface epitope for tumor targeting withgenetically-engineered re-directed T cells would be expressed solely ontumor cells in a homogeneous fashion and on all tumors within apopulation of patients with the same diagnosis. Modulation and/orshedding of the target molecule from the tumor cell membrane may alsoimpact on the utility of a particular target epitope for re-directed Tcell recognition. To date few “ideal” tumor-specific epitopes have beendefined and secondary epitopes have been targeted based on either lackof expression on critical normal tissues or relative over-expression ontumors. In the case of malignant glioma, the intracavitaryadministration of T cells for the treatment of this cancer permits theexpansion of target epitopes to those expressed on tumor cells but notnormal CNS with less stringency on expression by other tissues outsidethe CNS. The concern regarding toxicity from cross-reactivity of tissuesoutside the CNS is mitigated by a) the sequestration of cells in the CNSbased on the intracavitary route of administration and b) the low cellnumbers administered in comparison to cell doses typically administeredsystemically.

The IL-13Rα2 receptor stands out as the most ubiquitous and specificcell-surface target for malignant glioma⁴⁷. Sensitive autoradiographicand immunohistochemical studies fail to detect IL-13 receptors in theCNS^(46; 48). Moreover, mutation of the IL-13 cytokine to selectivelybind the glioma-restricted IL-13Rα2 receptor is a further safeguardagainst untoward reactivity of IL-13-directed therapeutics againstIL-13Rα1/IL-4β+ normal tissues outside the CNS^(55; 57). The potentialutility of targeting glioma IL-13Rα2 the design and testing of a novelengineered chimeric immunoreceptor for re-directing the specificity of Tcells that consists of an extracellular IL-13 mutant cytokine (E13Y)tethered to the plasma membrane by human IgG4 Fc which, in turn, isfused to CD4TM and the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 zeta. This chimericimmunoreceptor has been given the designation of “IL-13 zetakine.” TheIL-13Rα2 receptor/IL-13(E13Y) receptor-ligand pair is an excellent guidefor understanding and assessing the suitability of receptor-ligand pairsgenerally for use in zetakines. An ideal zetakine comprises anextracellular soluble receptor ligand having the properties ofIL-13(E13Y) (specificity for a unique cancer cell surface receptor, invivo stability due to it being derived from a naturally-occurringsoluble cell signal molecule, low immunogenicity for the same reason).The use of soluble receptor ligands as distinct advantages over theprior art use of antibody fragments (such as the scFvFc immunoreceptors)or cell adhesion molecules, in that soluble receptor ligands are morelikely to be stable in the extracellular environment, non-antigenic, andmore selective.

Chimeric immunoreceptors according to the present invention comprise anextracellular domain comprised of a soluble receptor ligand linked to anextracellular support region that tethers the ligand to the cell surfacevia a transmembrane domain, in turn linked to an intracellular receptorsignaling domain. Examples of suitable soluble receptor ligands includeautocrine and paracrine growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, hormones,and engineered artificial small molecule ligands that exhibit therequired specificity. Natural ligand sequences can also be engineered toincrease their specificity for a particular target cell. Selection of asoluble receptor ligand for use in a particular zetakine is governed bythe nature of the target cell, and the qualities discussed above withregard to the IL-13(E13Y) molecule, a preferred ligand for use againstglioma. Examples of suitable support regions include the constant (Fc)regions of immunoglobins, human CD8α, and artificial linkers that serveto move the targeting moiety away from the cell surface for improvedaccess to receptor binding on target cells. A preferred support regionis the Fc region of an IgG (such as IgG4). Examples of suitabletransmembrane domains include the transmembrane domains of the leukocyteCD markers, preferably that of CD8. Examples of intracellular receptorsignaling domains are those of the T cell antigen receptor complex,preferably the zeta chain of CD3 also Fcγ RIII costimulatory signalingdomains, CD28, DAP10, CD2, alone or in a series with CD3zeta.

In the IL-13 zetakine embodiment, the human IL-13 cDNA having the E13Yamino acid substitution was synthesized by PCR splice overlap extension.A full length IL-13 zetakine construct was assembled by PCR spliceoverlap extension and consists of the human GM-CSF receptor alpha chainleader peptide, IL-13(E13Y)-Gly-Gly-Gly, human IgG4 Fc, human CD4TM, andhuman cytoplasmic zeta chain. This cDNA construct was ligated into themultiple cloning site of a modified pMG plasmid under thetranscriptional control of the human Elongation Factor-1 alpha promoter(Invivogen, San Diego). This expression vector co-expresses the HyTKcDNA encoding the fusion protein HyTK that combines in a single moleculehygromycin phosphotransferase activity for in vitro selection oftransfectants and HSV thymidine kinase activity for in vivo ablation ofcells with ganciclovir from the CMV immediate/early promoter. Westernblot of whole cell Jurkat lysates pre-incubated with tunicamycin, aninhibitor of glycosylation, with an anti-zeta antibody probedemonstrated that the expected intact 56-kDa chimeric receptor proteinis expressed. This receptor is heavily glycosylated consistent withpost-translational modification of the native IL-13 cytokine¹⁰⁸. Flowcytometric analysis of IL-13 zetakine+ Jurkat cells with anti-humanIL-13 and anti-human Fc specific antibodies confirmed the cell-surfaceexpression of the IL-13 zetakine as a type I transmembrane protein.

Using established human T cell genetic modification methods developed atCity of Hope¹⁰⁷, primary human T cell clones expressing the IL-13zetakine chimeric immunoreceptor have been generated for pre-clinicalfunctional characterization. IL-13 zetakine+ CD8+ CTL clones displayrobust proliferative activity in ex vivo expansion cultures. Expandedclones display re-directed cytolytic activity in 4-hr chromium releaseassays against human IL-13Rα2+ glioblastoma cell lines. The level ofcytolytic activity correlates with levels of zetakine expression on Tcells and IL-13Rα2 receptor density on glioma target cells. In additionto killing, IL-13 zetakine+ clones are activated for cytokine secretion(IFN-γ, TNF-α, GM-CSF). Activation was specifically mediated by theinteraction of the IL-13 zetakine with the IL-13Rα2 receptor on gliomacells since CTL clones expressing an irrelevant chimeric immunoreceptordo not respond to glioma cells, and, since activation can be inhibitedin a dose-dependent manner by the addition to culture of soluble IL-13or blocking antibodies against IL-13 on T cell transfectants andIL-13Rα2 on glioma target cells. Lastly, IL-13 zetakine-expressing CD8+CTL clones proliferate when stimulated by glioma cells in culture. IL-13zetakine₊ CTL clones having potent anti-glioma effector activity willhave significant clinical activity against malignant gliomas withlimited collateral damage to normal CNS.

An immunoreceptor according to the present invention can be produced byany means known in the art, though preferably it is produced usingrecombinant DNA techniques. A nucleic acid sequence encoding the severalregions of the chimeric receptor can prepared and assembled into acomplete coding sequence by standard techniques of molecular cloning(genomic library screening, PCR, primer-assisted ligation, site-directedmutagenesis, etc.). The resulting coding region is preferably insertedinto an expression vector and used to transform a suitable expressionhost cell line, preferably a T lymphocyte cell line, and most preferablyan autologous T lymphocyte cell line. A third party derived T cellline/clone, a transformed humor or xerogenic immunologic effector cellline, for expression of the immunoreceptor. NK cells, macrophages,neutrophils, LAK cells, LIK cells, and stem cells that differentiateinto these cells, can also be used. In a preferred embodiment,lymphocytes are obtained from a patient by leukopharesis, and theautologous T cells are transduced to express the zetakine andadministered back to the patient by any clinically acceptable means, toachieve anti-cancer therapy.

Suitable doses for a therapeutic effect would be between about 10⁶ andabout 10⁹ cells per dose, preferably in a series of dosing cycles. Apreferred dosing regimen consists of four one-week dosing cycles ofescalating doses, starting at about 10⁷ cells on Day 0, increasingincrementally up to a target dose of about 10⁸ cells by Day 5. Suitablemodes of administration include intravenous, subcutaneous, intracavitary(for example by reservoir-access device), intraperitoneal, and directinjection into a tumor mass.

The following examples are solely for the purpose of illustrating oneembodiment of the invention.

EXAMPLE 1 Construction of an Immunoreceptor Coding Sequence

The coding sequence for an immunoreceptor according to the presentinvention was constructed by de novo synthesis of the IL13(E13Y) codingsequence using the following primers (see FIG. 8 for a flow chartshowing the construction of the immunoreceptor coding sequence andexpression vector):

IL13P1: (SEQ ID NO. 1)    EcoRITATGAATTCATGGCGCTTTTGTTGACCACGGTCATTGCTCTCACTTGCCTTGGCGGCTTTGCCTCCCCAGGCCCTGTGCCTCCCTCTACAGCCCTCAGGTAC IL13P2: (SEQ ID NO. 2)GTTGATGCTCCATACCATGCTGCCATTGCAGAGCGGAGCCTTCTGGTTCTGGGTGATGTTGACCAGCTCCTCAATGAGGTACCTGAGGGCTGTAGAGGGAG IL13P3: (SEQ ID NO. 3)CTCTGGGTCTTCTCGATGGCACTGCAGCCTGACACGTTGATCAGGGATTCCAGGGCTGCACAGTACATGCCAGCTGTCAGGTTGATGCTCCATACCATGC IL13P4: (SEQ ID NO. 4)CCTCGATTTTGGTGTCTCGGACATGCAAGCTGGAAAACTGCCCAGCTGAGACCTTGTGCGGGCAGAATCCGCTCAGCATCCTCTGGGTCTTCTCGATGGC IL13P5: (SEQ ID NO. 5)   BamHITCGGATCCTCAGTTGAACCGTCCCTCGCGAAAAAGTTTCTTTAAATGTAAGAGCAGGTCCTTTACAAACTGGGCCACCTCGATTTTGGTGTCTCGG

The final sequence (417 bp) was end-digested with EcoRI-BamHI, andligated into the plasmid pSK (stratagene, LaJolla, Calif.) as ligation312#3. Ligation 312#3 was mutagenized (stratagene kit, permanufacturer's instructions) to fix a deleted nucleotide using theprimers 5′: IL13 312#3 mut5-3 (CAACCTGACAGCTGGCATGTACTGTGCAGCCCTGGAATC(SEQ ID NO. 6)) and 3′: IL13 312#3 mut3-5(GATTCCAGGGCTGCACAGTACATGCCAGCTGTCAGGTTG (SEQ ID NO. 7)), and ligation312#3 as a template, to form ligation 348#1 (IL13zetakine/pSK).

The coding Human GM-CSFR alpha chain Signal Peptide (hsp) codingsequence was fused to the 5′ end of IL13(E13Y) by standard PCR spliceoverlap extension. The hsp sequence (101 bp) was obtained from thetemplate ligation 301#10 (hsp/pSK) (human GCSF receptor α-chain leadersequence from human T cell cDNA), using the primers 5′:19hsp5′(ATCTCTAGAGCCGCCACCATGCTTCTCCTGGTGACAAGCCTTC (SEQ ID NO. 8)) (XbaI sitehighlighted in bold), and 3′: hsp-IL13FR(GAGGGAGGCACAGGGCCTGGGATCAGGAGGAATG (SEQ ID NO. 9)). The IL-13 sequence(371 bp) was obtained using the primers 5′: hsp-IL13FF(CATTCCTCCTGATCCCAGGCCCTGTGCCTCCCTC (SEQ ID NO. 10)) and 3′: IL13-IgG4FR(GGGACCATATTTGGACTCGTTGAACCGTCCCTCGC (SEQ ID NO. 11)), and ligation312#3 as template. Fusion was achieved using the 101 by hsp sequence and371 bp IL13 sequence thus obtained, and the primers 5′: 19hsp5′ and 3′:IL13-IgG4FR, to yeild a 438 bp fusion hsp-IL13 sequence.

A sequence encoding the IgG4 Fc region IgG4m:zeta was fused to the 3′end of the hsp-IL13 fusion sequence using the same methods. TheIgG4m:zeta sequence (1119 bp) was obtained using the primers 5′:IL13-IgG4FF (GCGAGGGACGGTTCAACGAGTCCAAATATGGTCCC (SEQ ID NO. 12)) and3′: ZetaN3′ (ATGCGGCCGCTCAGCGAGGGGGCAGG (SEQ ID NO. 13)) (NotI sitehighlighted in bold), using the sequence R9.10 (IgG4mZeta/pSK) astemplate. The 1119 bp IgG4m:zeta sequence was fused to the hsp-IL13fusion sequence using the respective sequences as templates, and theprimers 5′: 19hsp5′ and 3′: ZetaN3′, to yeild a 1522 bphsp-IL13-IgG4m:zeta fusion sequence. The ends were digested withXbaI-NotI, and ligated into pSK as ligation 351#7, to create the plasmidIL13zetakine/pSK (4464 bp).

EXAMPLE 2 Construction of Expression Vector

An expression vector containing the IL13 zetakine coding sequence wascreated by digesting the IL13zetakine/pSK of Example 1 with XbaI-NotI,and creating blunt ends with Klenow, and ligating the resulting fragmentinto the plasmid pMGAPac (Invirogen) (first prepared by opening withSgrAl, blunting with Klenow, and dephosphorylation with SAP), to yieldthe plasmid IL13zetakine/pMG. See FIG. 8. The hygromycin resistanceregion of IL13zetakine/pMG was removed by digestion with NotI-NheI,NheI, and replaced by the selection/suicide fusion HyTK, obtained fromplasmid CE7R/HyTK-pMG (Jensen, City of Hope) by digestion withNotI-NheI, to create the expression vector IL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG (6785bp). This plasmid comprises the Human Elongation Factor-1α promoter(hEF1p) at bases 6-549, the IL13zetakine coding sequence at bases692-2185, the Simian Virus 40 Late polyadenylation signal (Late SV40pAN)at bases 2232-2500, a minimal E. coli origin of replication (Ori ColE1)at bases 2501-3247, a synthetic poly A and Pause site (SpAN) at bases3248-3434, the Immediate early CMV enhancer/promoter (h CMV-1Aprom) atbases 3455-4077, the Hygromycin resistance-Thymidine kinase codingregion fusion (HyTK) at bases 4259-6334, and the bovine growth hormonepolyadenylation signal and a transcription pause (BGh pAn) at bases6335-6633. The plasmid has a PacI linearization site at bases 3235-3242.The hEF1 p and IL13zetakine elements derived from IL13zetakine/pMG, andthe remaining elements derived from CE7R/HyTk-pMG (and with theexception of the HyTK element, ultimately from the parent plasmidpMĜPac). In sum, IL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG is a modified pMG backbone,expressing the IL13zetakine gene from the hEF1 promoter, and the HyTKfusion from the h CMV-1A promoter. A map of the plasmidIL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG appears in FIG. 9. The full nucleic acid sequenceof the plasmid is shown in FIG. 12. The sequence of an IL13zetakineinsert is given as SEQ ID NO:15, below. See also FIG. 11.

(SEQ ID NO: 15)atgcttctcctggtgacaagccttctgctctgtgagttaccacacccagcattcctcctgatcccaggccctgtgcctccctctacagccctcaggtacctcattgaggagctggtcaacatcacccagaaccagaaggctccgctctgcaatggcagcatggtatggagcatcaacctgacagctggcatgtactgtgcagccctggaatccctgatcaacgtgtcaggctgcagtgccatcgagaagacccagaggatgctgagcggattctgcccgcacaaggtctcagctgggcagttttccagcttgcatgtccgagacaccaaaatcgaggtggcccagtttgtaaaggacctgctcttacatttaaagaaactttttcgcgagggacggttcaacgagtccaaatatggtcccccatgcccaccatgcccagcacctgagttcctggggggaccatcagtcttcctgttccccccaaaacccaaggacactctcatgatctcccggacccctgaggtcacgtgcgtggtggtggacgtgagccaggaagaccccgaggtccagttcaactggtacgtggatggcgtggaggtgcataatgccaagacaaagccgcgggaggagcagttcaacagcacgtaccgtgtggtcagcgtcctcaccgtcctgcaccaggactggctgaacggcaaggagtacaagtgcaaggtctccaacaaaggcctcccgtcctccatcgagaaaaccatctccaaagccaaagggcagccccgagagccacaggtgtacaccctgcccccatcccaggaggagatgaccaagaaccaggtcagcctgacctgcctggtcaaaggcttctaccccagcgacatcgccgtggagtgggagagcaatgggcagccggagaacaactacaagaccacgcctcccgtgctggactccgacggctccttcttcctctacagcaggctaaccgtggacaagagcaggtggcaggaggggaatgtcttctcatgctccgtgatgcatgaggctctgcacaaccactacacacagaagagcctctccctgtccctaggtaaaatggccctgattgtgctggggggcgtcgccggcctcctgcttttcattgggctaggcatcttcttcagagtgaagttcagcaggagcgcagacgcccccgcgtaccagcagggccagaaccagctctataacgagctcaatctaggacgaagagaggagtacgatgttttggacaagagacgtggccgggaccctgagatggggggaaagccgagaaggaagaaccctcaggaaggcctgtacaatgaactgcagaaagataagatggcggaggcctacagtgagattgggatgaaaggcgagcgccggaggggcaaggggcacgatggcctttaccagggtctcagtacagccaccaaggacacctacgacgcccttcacatgcaggccctgccccctcgc.

EXAMPLE 3 Expression of the Immunoreceptor

Assessment of the integrity of the expressed construct was firstdelineated by Western blot probed with an anti-zeta antibody of wholecell lysates derived from Jurkat T cell stable transfectants¹⁰⁷cocultured in the presence or absence of tunicamycin, an inhibitor ofglycosylation. FIG. 1. Jurkat T cell stable transfectants(Jurkat-IL13-pMG bulk line) were obtained by electroporating Jurkat Tcells with the IL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG expression vector, followed byselection and expansion of positive transfectants. 2×10⁶ cells from theJurkat-IL13-pMG bulk line were plated per well in a 24-well plate withor without 5 μg/ml, 10 μg/ml, or 20 μg/ml Tunicamycin. The plate wasincubated at 37° C. for 22 hrs. Cells were harvested from each well, andeach sample was washed with PBS and resuspended in 50 μl RIPA buffer(PBS, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing 1tablet/10 ml Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim,Indianapolis, Ind.). Samples were incubated on ice for 30 minutes thendisrupted by aspiration with syringe with 21 gauge needle then incubatedon ice for an additional 30 minutes before being centrifuged at 4° C.for 20 minutes at 14,000 rpm. Samples of centrifuged lysate supernatantwere harvested and boiled in an equal volume of sample buffer underreducing conditions, then subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis on a 12%acrylamide gel. Following transfer to nitrocellulose, membrane wasallowed to dry O/N at 4° C. Next morning, membrane was blocked in aBlotto solution containing 0.04 gm/ml non-fat dried milk in T-TBS (0.02%Tween 20 in Tris buffered saline pH 8.0) for 1 hour. Membrane was thenincubated with primary mouse anti-human CD3ζ monoclonal antibody(Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.) at a concentration of 1 μg/ml for 2hours, washed, and then incubated with a 1:3000 dilution (in Blottosolution) of goat anti-mouse IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugatedsecondary antibody (Bio-Rad ImmunoStar Kit, Hercules, Calif.) for 1hour. Prior to developing, membrane was washed 4 additional times inT-TBS, and then incubated with 3 ml of phosphatase substrate solution(Biorad ImmunoStar Kit, Hercules, Calif.) for 5 minutes at roomtemperature. Membrane was then covered with plastic, and exposed tox-ray film. Consistant with the known glycosylation pattern of wild-typehuman IL-13, the electrophoretic mobility of expressed IL-13(E13Y)zetakine is demonstrative of a heavily glycosylated protein which, whenexpressed in the presence of tunicamycin, is reduced to an amino acidbackbone of approximately 54 kDa.

The IL-13(E13Y) zetakine traffics to the cell surface as a homodimerictype I transmembrane protein, as evidenced by flow cytometric analysisof transfectants with a phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti human-IL13monoclonal antibody and a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugatedmouse anti-human Fc (gamma) fragment-specific F(ab′)₂ antibody. FIG. 2.Jurkat IL13zetakine-pMG transfectants were stained with anti-humanFc(FITC) antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa.), recombinanthuman IL13Rα2/human IgG1 chimera (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.)followed by FITC-conjugated anti human-IgG1 monoclonal antibody (Sigma,St. Louis, Mo.), and an anti-IL13(PE) antibody (Becton Dickinson, SanJose, Calif.) for analysis of cell surface chimeric receptor expression.Healthy donor primary cells were also stained with FITC-conjugatedanti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-TCR, and isotype control monoclonal antibodies(Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.) to assess cell surface phenotype.For each stain, 10⁶ cells were washed and resuspended in 100 μl of PBScontaining 2% FCS, 0.2 mg/ml NaN₃, and 5 μl of stock antibody. Followinga 30 minute incubation at 4° C., cells were washed twice and eitherstained with a secondary antibody, or resuspended in PBS containing 1%paraformaldehyde and analyzed on a FACSCaliber cytometer.

EXAMPLE 4 Binding of IL13(E13Y) Zetakine to IL13Rα2 Receptor

IL-13(E13Y), tethered to the cell membrane by human IgG4 Fc (i.e.,IL13(E13Y) zetakine), is capable of binding to its target IL13Rα2receptor as assessed by flow cytometric analysis using solubleIL13Rα2-Fc fusion protein. FIG. 3. Cloned human PBMC IL13zetakine-pMGtransfectants were obtained by electroporating PBMC with theIL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG expression vector, followed by selection andexpansion of positive transfectants¹⁰⁷. IL13zetakine⁺ CTL clonal cellswere stained with a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouseanti-human Fc (gamma) fragment-specific F(ab′)₂ (Jackson ImmunoResearch,West Grove, Pa.), recombinant human IL13Rα2/human IgG1 chimera (R&DSystems, Minneapolis, Minn.) followed by FITC-conjugated anti human-IgG1monoclonal antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), and a phycoerythrin(PE)-conjugated anti human-IL13 monoclonal antibody (Becton Dickinson,San Jose, Calif.) for analysis of cell surface chimeric receptorexpression. Healthy donor primary cells were also stained withFITC-conjugated anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-TCR, and isotype controlmonoclonal antibodies (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.) to assesscell surface phenotype. For each stain, 10⁶ cells were washed andresuspended in 100 μl of PBS containing 2% FCS, 02 mg/ml NaN₃, and 5 μlof antibody. Following a 30 minute incubation at 4° C., cells werewashed twice and either stained with a secondary antibody, orresuspended in PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde and analyzed on aFACSCaliber cytometer.

Next, the immunobiology of the IL-13(E13Y) zetakine as a surrogateantigen receptor for primary human T cells was evaluated. Primary humanT cells were electroporated with the plasmid expression vector. Positivetransformants were selected with hygromycin, cloned in limitingdilution, then expanded by recursive stimulation cyles with OKT3, IL-2and irradiated feeder cells. Clones demonstrating IL 13zetakineexpression by Western blot and FACS were then subjected to functionalevaluation in 4-hr chromium release assays against a variety ofIL-13α2⁺/CD20⁻ glioma cell lines (U251, SN-B19, U138), and theIL-13α⁻/CD20⁺ B cell lymphocyte line Daudi). These tests showed thatIL13zetakine conferred cytolytic activity that was specific for gliomacells (FIGS. 4A and 4B), and that this specific cytolytic activity ispresent for glioma cells as a class (FIGS. 4C, 4D, 4E and 4F). Thecytolytic activity of MJ-IL13-pMG clones was assayed by employing⁵¹Cr-labeled SN-B19, U251, and U138 glioma cell lines (IL13α2+/CD20−)and Daudi (CD20+/IL13α2−) as targets. MJ-IL13 effectors were assayed8-12 days following stimulation. Effectors were harvested, washed, andresuspended in assay media: 2.5×10⁵, 1.25×10⁵, 2.5×10⁴, and 5×10³effectors were cultured in triplicate at 37° C. for 4 hours with 5×10³target cells in 96-well V-bottom microtiter plates. After incubation,100 μl aliquots of cell-free supernatant were harvested and ⁵¹Cr in thesupernatants was assayed with a γ-counter. Percent specific cytolysiswas calculated as follows:

$\frac{\left( {{Experimental}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right) - \left( {{control}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right)}{\left( {{Maximum}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right) - \left( {{control}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right)} \times 100$

Control wells contained target cells incubated in the presence of targetcells alone. Maximum ⁵¹Cr release was determined by measuring the ⁵¹Crreleased by labeled target cells in the presence of 2% SDS. Bulk linesof stabley transfected human T cells consisting of approximately 40%IL-13(E13Y) zetakine+ TCRα/β+ lymphocytes displayed re-directedcytolysis specific for 13Rα2+ glioma targets in 4-hr chromium releaseassays (>50% specific lysis at E:T ratios of 25:1), with negligableacitivity against IL-13Rα2⁻ targets (<8% specific lysis at E:T ratios of25:1). IL-13(E13Y) zetakine⁺CD8⁺TCRα/β⁺ CTL clones selected on the basisof high-level binding to anti-IL-13 antibody also display redirectedIL13Rα2-specific glioma cell killing. FIGS. 4C, 4D, 4E and 4F.

IL-13 zetakine-expressing CD8+ CTL clones are activated and proliferatewhen stimulated by glioma cells in culture. FIGS. 5-7. MJ-IL13-pMG Cl.F2 responder cells expressing the IL13 zetakine were evaluated forreceptor-mediated triggering of IFNγ, GM-CSF, and TNFα production invitro. 2×10⁶ responder cells were co-cultured in 24-well tissue cultureplates with 2×10⁵ irradiated stimulator cells (Daudi, Fibroblasts,Neuroblastoma 10HTB, and glioblastoma U251) in 2 ml total. Blocking ratanti-human-IL13 monoclonal antibody (Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.),recombinant human IL13 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.), andIL13Rα2-specific goat IgG (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) were addedto aliquots of U251 stimulator cells (2×10⁵/ml) at concentrations of 1ng/ml, 10 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 1 μg/ml, 30 minutes prior to theaddition of responder cells. Plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37°C., after which time culture supernatants were harvested, aliquoted, andstored at −70° C. ELISA assays for IFNγ, GM-CSF, and TNFα were carriedout using the R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.) kit per manufacturer'sinstructions. Samples were tested in duplicate wells undiluted ordiluted at 1:5 or 1:10. The developed ELISA plate was evaluated on amicroplate reader and cytokine concentrations determined byextrapolation from a standard curve. Results are reported aspicograms/ml, and show strong activation for cytokine production byglioma stimulator cells. FIG. 5, FIG. 6.

Lastly, IL-2 independent proliferation of IL13zetakine^(+ CD)8⁺ CTL wasobserved upon co-cultivation with glioma stimulators (FIG. 7A), but notwith IL13 Rα2 stimulators. Proliferation was inhibited by the additionof rhIL-13 antibody (FIG. 7B), showing that the observed proliferationwas dependant on binding of zetakine to the IL-13Rα2 gliomacell-sepcific receptor.

EXAMPLE 5 Preparation of IL-13 Zetakine T Cells Suitable for TherapeuticUse

The mononuclear cells are separated from heparinized whole blood bycentrifugation over clinical grade Ficoll (Pharmacia, Uppsula, Sweden).PBMC are washed twice in sterile phosphate buffered saline (IrvineScientific) and suspended in culture media consisting of RPM! 1640HEPES, 10% heat inactivated FCS, and 4 mM L-glutamine. T cells presentin patient PBMC are polyclonally activated by addition to culture ofOrthoclone OKT3 (30 ng/ml). Cell cultures are then incubated in ventedT75 tissue culture flasks in the study subject's designated incubator.Twenty-four hours after initiation of culture rhIL-2 is added at 25U/ml.

Three days after the initiation of culture PBMC are harvested,centrifuged, and resuspended in hypotonic electroporation buffer(Eppendorf) at 20×10⁶ cells/ml. 25 μg of the plasmidIL13zetakine/HyTK-pMG of Example 3, together with 400 μl of cellsuspension, are added to a sterile 0.2 cm electroporation cuvette. Eachcuvette is subjected to a single electrical pulse of 250V/40 μs andagain incubated for ten minutes at RT. Surviving cells are harvestedfrom cuvettes, pooled, and resuspended in culture media containing 25U/ml rhIL-2. Flasks are placed in the patient's designated tissueculture incubator. Three days following electroporation hygromycin isadded to cells at a final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml. ElectroporatedPBMC are cultured for a total of 14 days with media and IL-2supplementation every 48-hours.

The cloning of hygromycin-resistant CD8+ CTL from electroporatedOKT3-activated patient PBMC is initiated on day 14 of culture. Briefly,viable patient PBMC are added to a mixture of 100×10⁶ cyropreservedirradiated feeder PBMC and 20×10⁶ irradiated TM-LCL in a volume of 200ml of culture media containing 30 ng/ml OKT3 and 50 U/ml rhIL-2. Thismastermix is plated into ten 96-well cloning plates with each wellreceiving 0.2 ml. Plates are wrapped in aluminum foil to decreaseevaporative loss and placed in the patient's designated tissue cultureincubator. On day 19 of culture each well receives hygromycin for afinal concentration of 0.2 mg/ml. Wells are inspected for cellularoutgrowth by visualization on an inverted microscope at Day 30 andpositive wells are marked for restimulation.

The contents of each cloning well with cell growth are individuallytransferred to T25 flasks containing 50×10⁶ irradiated PBMC, 10×10⁶irradiated LCL, and 30 ng/ml OKT3 in 25 mls of tissue culture media. Ondays 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 after restimulation flasks receive 50U/ml rhIL-2 and 15 mls of fresh media. On day 5 of the stimulation cycleflasks are also supplemented with hygromycin 0.2 mg/ml. Fourteen daysafter seeding cells are harvested, counted, and restimulated in T75flasks containing 150×10⁶ irradiated PBMC, 30×10⁶ irradiated TM-LCL and30 ng/ml OKT3 in 50 mls of tissue culture media. Flasks receiveadditions to culture of rhIL-2 and hygromycin as outlined above.

CTL selected for expansion for possible use in therapy are analyzed byimmunofluorescence on a FACSCalibur housed in CRB-3006 usingFITC-conjugated monoclonal antibodies WT/31 (aβTCR), Leu 2a (CD8), andOKT4 (CD4) to confirm the requisite phenotype of clones (αβTCR+, CD4−,CD8+, and IL13+). Criteria for selection of clones for clinical useinclude uniform TCR αβ+, CD4−, CD8+ and IL13+ as compared to isotypecontrol FITC/PE-conjugated antibody. A single site of plasmid vectorchromosomal integration is confirmed by Southern blot analysis. DNA fromgenetically modified T cell clones will be screened with a DNA probespecific for the plasmid vector. Probe DNA specific for the HyTK in theplasmid vector is synthesized by random priming withflorescein-conjugated dUTP per the manufacture's instructions (Amersham,Arlington Hts, Ill.). T cell genomic DNA is isolated per standardtechnique. Ten micrograms of genomic DNA from T cell clones is digestedovernight at 37° C. then electrophoretically separated on a 0.85%agarose gel. DNA is then transferred to nylon filters (BioRad, Hercules,Calif.) using an alkaline capillary transfer method. Filters arehybridized overnight with probe in 0.5 M Na₂PO₄, pH 7.2, 7% SDS,containing 10 μg/ml salmon sperm DNA (Sigma) at 65° C. Filters are thenwashed four times in 40 mM Na₂PO₄, pH 7.2, 1% SDS at 65° C. and thenvisualized using a chemiluminescence AP-conjugated anti-floresceinantibody (Amersham, Arlington Hts, Ill.). Criteria for clone selectionis a single band unique vector band.

Expression of the IL-13 zetakine is determined by Western blot procedurein which chimeric receptor protein is detected with an anti-zetaantibody. Whole cell lysates of transfected T cell clones are generatedby lysis of 2×10⁷ washed cells in 1 ml of RIPA buffer (PBS, 1% NP40,0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing 1 tablet/10 ml CompleteProtease Inhibitor Cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim). After an eightyminute incubation on ice, aliquots of centrifuged whole cell lysatesupernatant are harvested and boiled in an equal volume of loadingbuffer under reducing conditions then subjected to SDS-PAGEelectrophoresis on a precast 12% acrylamide gel (BioRad). Followingtransfer to nitrocellulose, membranes are blocked in blotto solutioncontaining 0.07 gm/ml non-fat dried milk for 2 hours. Membranes arewashed in T-TBS (0.05% Tween 20 in Tris buffered saline pH 8.0) thenincubated with primary mouse anti-human CD3ζ monoclonal antibody 8D3(Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.) at a concentration of 1 μg/ml for 2hours. Following an additional four washes in T-TBS, membranes areincubated with a 1:500 dilution of goat anti-mouse IgG alkalinephosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour. Prior todeveloping, membranes are rinsed in T-TBS then developed with 30 ml of“AKP” solution (Promega, Madison, Wis.) per the manufacturer'sinstructions. Criteria for clone selection is the presence of a chimericzeta band.

CD8+ cytotoxic T cell clones expressing the IL-13 zetakine chimericimmunoreceptor recognize and lyse human glioblastoma target cellsfollowing interaction of the chimeric receptor with the cell surfacetarget epitope in a HLA-unrestricted fashion. The requirements fortarget IL-13Rα2 epitope expression and class I MHC independentrecognition will be confirmed by assaying each aβTCR+, CD8+, CD4−, IL-13zetakine+ CTL clones against IL-13Rα2+ Daudi cell transfectants andIL-13Rα2− Daudi cells. T cell effectors are assayed 12-14 days followingstimulation with OKT3. Effectors are harvested, washed, and resuspendedin assay media; and Daudi cell transfectants expressing IL-13Rα2.2.5×10⁵, 1.25×10⁵, 0.25×10⁵, and 0.05×10⁵ effectors are plated intriplicate at 37° C. for 4 hours with 5×10³ target cells in V-bottommicrotiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.). After centrifugation andincubation, 100 μL aliquots of cell-free supernatant is harvested andcounted. Percent specific cytolysis is calculated as:

$\frac{\left( {{Experimental}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right) - \left( {{control}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right)}{\left( {{Maximum}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right) - \left( {{control}\mspace{14mu} {\,^{51}{Cr}}\mspace{14mu} {release}} \right)} \times 100$

Control wells contain target cells incubated in assay media. Maximum⁵¹Cr release is determined by measuring the ⁵¹Cr content of target cellslysed with 2% SDS. Criteria for clone selection is >25% specific lysisof IL-13Rα2+ Daudi transfectants at an E:T ratio of 5:1 and a <10% lysisof parental Daudi at the same E:T ratio.

EXAMPLE 6 Treatment of Human Glioma Using IL-13 Zetakine-Expressing TCells

T cell clones genetically modified according to Example 5 to express theIL-13R zetakine chimeric immunoreceptor and HyTK are selected for:

-   a. TCRα/β⁺, CD4⁻, CD8⁺, IL-13⁺ cell surface phenotype as determined    by flow cytometry.-   b. Presence of a single copy of chromosomally integrated plasmid    vector DNA as evidenced by Southern blot.-   c. Expression of the IL-13 zetakine protein as detected by Western    blot.-   d. Specific lysis of human IL-13Rα2⁺ targets in 4-hr chromium    release assays.-   e. Dependence on exogenous IL-2 for in vitro growth.-   f. Mycoplasma, fungal, bacterial sterility and endotoxin levels <5    EU/ml.-   g. In vitro sensitivity of clones to ganciclovir.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are obtained from the patient byleukapheresis, preferably following recovery from initial resectionsurgery and at a time at least three weeks from tapering off steroidsand/or their most recent systemic chemotherapy. The target leukapheresismononuclear cell yield is 5×10⁹ and the target number ofhygromycin-resistant cytolytic T cell clones is 25 with the expectationthat at least five clones will be identified that meet all qualitycontrol parameters for ex-vivo expansion. Clones are cryopreserved andpatients monitored by serial radiographic and clinical examinations.When recurrence of progression of disease is documented, patientsundergo a re-resection and/or placement of a reservoir-access device(Omaya reservoir) for delivering T cells to the tumor resection cavity.Following recovery from surgery and tapering of steroids, if applicable,the patient commences with T cell therapy.

The patient receives a target of at least four one-week cycles oftherapy. During the first cycle, cell dose escalation proceeds from aninitial dose on Day 0 of 10⁷ cells, followed by 5×10⁷ cells on Day 3 tothe target dose of 10⁸ cells on Day 5. Cycle 2 commences as early as oneweek from commencement of cycle 1. Those patients demonstrating tumorregression with residual disease on MRI may have additional courses oftherapy beginning no earlier than Week 7 consisting of repetition ofCycles 3 and 4 followed by one week of rest/restaging provided thesetreatments are well tolerated (max. toxicities<grade 3) until such timethat disease progression or a CR is achieved based on radiographicevaluation.

Cell doses are at least a log less than doses given in studies employingintracavitary LAK cells (individual cell doses of up to 10⁹ andcumulative cell numbers as high as 2.75×10¹⁰ have been safetyadministered), ex vivo expanded TILs (up to 10⁹ cells/dose reported withminimal toxicity) and allo-reactive lymphocyte (starting cell dose 10⁸with cumulative cell doses up to 51.5×10⁸) delivered to a similarpatient population⁷⁵⁻⁸⁵. The rationale for the lower cell doses asproposed in this protocol is based on the increased in vitroreactivity/anti-tumor potency of IL-13 zetakine+ CTL clones compared tothe modest reactivity profile of previously utilized effector cellpopulations. Low-dose repetitive dosing is favored to avoid potentiallydangerous inflammatory responses that might occur with single large cellnumber instillations. Each infusion will consist of a single T cellclone. The same clone will be administered throughout a patient'streatment course. On the days of T cell administration, expanded clonesare aseptically processed by washing twice in 50 cc of PBS thenresuspended in pharmaceutical preservative-free normal saline in avolume that results in the cell dose for patient delivery in 2mls. Tcells are instilled over 5-10 minutes. A 2 ml PFNS flush will beadministered over 5 minutes following T cells. Response to therapy isassessed by brain MRI +/−gandolinium, with spectroscopy.

Expected side-effects of administration of T cells into glioma resectioncavities typically consist of self-limited nausea and vomiting, fever,and transient worsening of existing neurological deficits. Thesetoxicities can be attributed to both the local inflammation/edema in thetumor bed mediated by T cells in combination with the action of secretedcytokines. These side-effects typically are transient and less thangrade II in severity. Should patients experience more severe toxicitiesit is expected that decadron alone or in combination with ganciclovirwill attenuate the inflammatory process and ablate the infused cells.The inadvertent infusion of a cell product that is contaminated withbacteria or fungus has the potential of mediating serious orlife-threatening toxicities. Extensive pre-infusion culturing of thecell product is conducted to identify contaminated tissue culture flasksand minimize this possibility. On the day of re-infusion, gram stains ofculture fluids, as well as, endotoxin levels are performed.

Extensive molecular analysis for expression of IL-13Rα2 has demonstratedthat this molecule is tumor-specific in the context of theCNS^(44; 46; 48; 54). Furthermore, the only human tissue withdemonstrable IL-13Rα2 expression appears to be the testis⁴². Thistumor-testis restrictive pattern of expression is reminiscent of thegrowing number of tumor antigens (i.e. MAGE, BAGE, GAGE) expressed by avariety of human cancers, most notably melanoma and renal cellcarcinoma¹⁰⁹⁻¹¹¹. Clinical experience with vaccine and adoptive T celltherapy has demonstrated that this class of antigens can be exploitedfor systemic tumor immunotherapy without concurrent autoimmune attack ofthe testis¹¹²⁻¹¹⁴. Presumably this selectively reflects the effect of anintact blood-testis barrier and an immunologically privilegedenvironment within the testis. Despite the exquisite specificity of themutant IL-13 targeting moiety, toxicities are theoretically possible ifcells egress into the systemic circulation in sufficient numbers andrecognize tissues expressing the IL-13Rα1/IL-4β receptor. In light ofthis remote risk, as well as the possibility that instilled T cells insome patients may mediate an overly exuberant inflammatory response inthe tumor bed, clones are equipped with the HyTK gene which renders Tcells susceptible to in vivo ablation with ganciclovir¹¹⁵⁻¹¹⁸.Ganciclovir-suicide, in combination with an intra-patient T cell doseescalation strategy, helps minimize the potential risk to researchparticipants.

Side effects associated with therapy (headache, fever, chills, nausea,etc.) are managed using established treatments appropriate for thecondition. The patient receives ganciclovir if any new grade 3 or anygrade 4 treatment-related toxicity is observed that, in the opinion ofthe treating physician, puts that patient at significant medical danger.Parentally administered ganciclovir is dosed at 10 mg/kg/day dividedevery 12 hours. A 14-day course will be prescribed but may be extendedshould symptomatic resolution not be achieved in that time interval.Treatment with ganciclovir leads to the ablation of IL-13 zetakine⁺HyTK⁺ CD8⁺ CTL clones. Patients should be hospitalized for the first 72hours of ganciclovir therapy for monitoring purposes. If symptoms do notrespond to ganciclovir within 48 hours additional immunosuppressiveagents including but not limited to corticosteroids and cyclosporin maybe added at the discretion of the treating physician. If toxicities aresevere, decadron and/or other immunosuppressive drugs along withganciclovir are used earlier at the discretion of the treatingphysician.

EXAMPLE 7 Additional Preferred DNA Vectors

Additional DNA vectors are shown in FIGS. 12-14. Table I, below containsfurther information concerning the sequence of FIG. 13. See FIG. 10 fora map of this vector.

TABLE I Plasmid DNA Vector Sequence Contents for SEQ ID NO: 19. LocationPlasmid Element Description (bases) hEF1p Human Elongation Factor-1αPromoter  6-549 IL13zetakine IL13 cytokine fused to Fc: ζ  690-2183 LateSV40pAn Simian Virus 40 Late polyadenylation 2230-2498 signal Ori ColE1A minimal E. coli origin of replication 2499-3245 SpAn A synthetic polyA and Pause site 3246-3432 hCMV-1Aprom Immediate-early CMVenhancer/promoter 3433-4075 HyTK Genetic fusion of the Hygromycin4244-6319 Resistance and Thymidine Kinase coding regions BGh pAn Bovinegrowth hormone polyadenylation 6320-6618 signal and a transcriptionalpause

REFERENCES

-   1. Davis F G, McCarthy B J. Epidemiology of brain tumors. Curr Opin    Neurol. 2000; 13:635-640.-   2. Davis F G, Malinski N, Haenszel W, et al. Primary brain tumor    incidence rates in four United States regions, 1985-1989: a pilot    study. Neuroepidemiology. 1996; 15:103-112.-   3. Smith M A, Freidlin B, Ries L A, Simon R. Increased incidence    rates but no space-time clustering of childhood astrocytoma in    Sweden, 1973-1992: a population-based study of pediatric brain    tumors. Cancer. 2000; 88:1492-1493.-   4. Ahsan H, Neugut A I, Bruce J N. Trends in incidence of primary    malignant brain tumors in USA, 1981-1990. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;    24:1078-1085.-   5. Ashby L S, Obbens E A, Shapiro W R. Brain tumors. Cancer    Chemother Biol Response Modif. 1999; 18:498-549.-   6. Davis F G, Freels S, Grutsch J, Barlas S, Brem S. Survival rates    in patients with primary malignant brain tumors stratified by    patient age and tumor histological type: an analysis based on    Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, 1973-1991.    J Neurosurg. 1998; 88:1-10.-   7. Duffner P K, Cohen M E, Myers M H, Heise H W. Survival of    children with brain tumors: SEER Program, 1973-1980. Neurology.    1986; 36:597-601.-   8. Davis F G, Freels S, Grutsch J, Barlas S, Brem S. Survival rates    in patients with primary malignant brain tumors stratified by    patient age and tumor histological type: an analysis based on    Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, 1973-1991.    J Neurosurg. 1998; 88:1-10.-   9. Kolles H, Niedermayer I, Feiden W. Grading of astrocytomas and    oligodendrogliomas. Pathologe. 1998; 19:259-268.-   10. Huncharek M, Muscat J. Treatment of recurrent high grade    astrocytoma; results of a systematic review of 1,415 patients.    Anticancer Res. 1998; 18:1303-1311.-   11. Loiseau H, Kantor G. The role of surgery in the treatment of    glial tumors. Cancer Radiother. 2000; 4 Suppl 1:48s-52s.-   12. Palma L. Trends in surgical management of astrocytomas and other    brain gliomas. Forum (Genova). 1998; 8:272-281.-   13. Azizi S A, Miyamoto C. Principles of treatment of malignant    gliomas in adults: an overview. J Neurovirol. 1998; 4:204-216.-   14. Shapiro W R, Shapiro J R. Biology and treatment of malignant    glioma. Oncology (Huntingt). 1998; 12:233-240.-   15. Chamberlain M C, Kormanik P A. Practical guidelines for the    treatment of malignant gliomas. West J Med. 1998; 168:114-120.-   16. Ushio Y. Treatment of gliomas in adults. Curr Opin Oncol. 1991;    3:467-475.-   17. Scott J N, Rewcastle N B, Brasher P M, et al. Long-term    glioblastoma multiforme survivors: a population-based study. Can J    Neurol Sci. 1998; 25:197-201.-   18. Finlay J L, Wisoff J H. The impact of extent of resection in the    management of malignant gliomas of childhood. Childs Nerv Syst.    1999; 15:786-788.-   19. Hess K R. Extent of resection as a prognostic variable in the    treatment of gliomas. J Neurooncol. 1999; 42:227-231.-   20. van den Bent M J. Chemotherapy in adult malignant glioma. Front    Radiat Ther Oncol. 1999; 33:174-191.-   21. DeAngelis L M, Burger P C, Green S B, Cairncross J G. Malignant    glioma: who benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy? Ann Neurol. 1998;    44:691-695.-   22. Armstrong T S, Gilbert M R. Chemotherapy of astrocytomas: an    overview. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1998; 14:18-25.-   23. Prados M D, Russo C. Chemotherapy of brain tumors. Semin Surg    Oncol. 1998; 14:88-95.-   24. Prados M D, Scott C, Curran W J, Nelson D F, Leibel S, Kramer S.    Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for    anaplastic astrocytoma: A retrospective review of radiation therapy    oncology group protocols comparing survival with carmustine or PCV    adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17:3389-3395.-   25. Fine H A, Dear K B, Loeffler J S, Black P M, Canellos G P.    Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant    chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer. 1993;    71:2585-2597.-   26. Mahaley M S, Gillespie G Y. New therapeutic approaches to    treatment of malignant gliomas: chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Clin    Neurosurg. 1983; 31:456-469.-   27. Millot F, Delval O, Giraud C, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with    hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults with bone marrow    relapse of medulloblastoma: report of two cases. Bone Marrow    Transplant. 1999; 24:1347-1349.-   28. Kalifa C, Valteau D, Pizer B, Vassal G, Grill J, Hartmann O.    High-dose chemotherapy in childhood brain tumours. Childs Nerv Syst.    1999; 15:498-505.-   29. Finlay J L. The role of high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell    rescue in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Bone Marrow    Transplant. 1996; 18 Suppl 3:S1-S5.-   30. Brandes A A, Vastola F, Monfardini S. Reoperation in recurrent    high-grade gliomas: literature review of prognostic factors and    outcome. Am J Clin Oncol. 1999; 22:387-390.-   31. Miyagi K, Ingram M, Techy G B, Jacques D B, Freshwater D B,    Sheldon H. Immunohistochemical detection and correlation between MHC    antigen and cell-mediated immune system in recurrent glioma by APAAP    method. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1990; 30:649-655.-   32. Bauman G S, Sneed P K, Wara W M, et al. Reirradiation of primary    CNS tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996; 36:433-441.-   33. Fine H A. Novel biologic therapies for malignant gliomas.    Antiangiogenesis, immunotherapy, and gene therapy. Neurol Clin.    1995; 13:827-846.-   34. Brandes A A, Pasetto L M. New therapeutic agents in the    treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Forum (Genova). 2000;    10:121-131.-   35. Pollack I F, Okada H, Chambers W H. Exploitation of immune    mechanisms in the treatment of central nervous system cancer. Semin    Pediatr Neurol. 2000; 7:131-143.-   36. Black K L, Pikul B K. Gliomas—past, present, and future. Clin    Neurosurg. 1999; 45:160-163.-   37. Riva P, Franceschi G, Arista A, et al. Local application of    radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of high grade    malignant gliomas: a six-year clinical experience. Cancer. 1997;    80:2733-2742.-   38. Liang B C, Weil M. Locoregional approaches to therapy with    gliomas as the paradigm. Curr Opin Oncol. 1998; 10:201-206.-   39. Yu J S, Wei M X, Chiocca E A, Martuza R L, Tepper R I. Treatment    of glioma by engineered interleukin 4-secreting cells. Cancer Res.    1993; 53:3125-3128.-   40. Alavi J B, Eck S L. Gene therapy for malignant gliomas. Hematol    Oncol Clin North Am. 1998; 12:617-629.-   41. Debinski W. Recombinant cytotoxins specific for cancer cells.    Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999; 886:297-299.-   42. Debinski W, Gibo D M. Molecular expression analysis of    restrictive receptor for interleukin 13, a brain tumor-associated    cancer/testis antigen. Mol Med. 2000; 6:440-449.-   43. Mintz A, Debinski W. Cancer genetics/epigenetics and the X    chromosome: possible new links for malignant glioma pathogenesis and    immune-based therapies. Crit Rev Oncog. 2000; 11:77-95.-   44. Joshi B H, Plautz G E, Puri R K. Interleukin-13 receptor alpha    chain: a novel tumor-associated transmembrane protein in primary    explants of human malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 2000; 60:1168-1172.-   45. Debinski W, Obiri N I, Powers S K, Pastan I, Puri R K. Human    glioma cells overexpress receptors for interleukin 13 and are    extremely sensitive to a novel chimeric protein composed of    interleukin 13 and pseudomonas exotoxin. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;    1:1253-1258.-   46. Debinski W, Gibo D M, Hulet S W, Connor J R, Gillespie G Y.    Receptor for interleukin 13 is a marker and therapeutic target for    human high-grade gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1999; 5:985-990.-   47. Debinski W. An immune regulatory cytokine receptor and    glioblastoma multiforme: an unexpected link. Crit Rev Oncog. 1998;    9:255-268.-   48. Debinski W, Slagle B, Gibo D M, Powers S K, Gillespie G Y.    Expression of a restrictive receptor for interleukin 13 is    associated with glial transformation. J Neurooncol. 2000;    48:103-111.-   49. Debinski W, Miner R, Leland P, Obiri N I, Puri R K. Receptor for    interleukin (IL) 13 does not interact with IL4 but receptor for IL4    interacts with IL13 on human glioma cells. J Biol Chem. 1996;    271:22428-22433.-   50. Murata T, Obiri N I, Debinski W, Puri R K. Structure of IL-13    receptor: analysis of subunit composition in cancer and immune    cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 238:90-94.-   51. Opal S M, DePalo V A. Anti-inflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000;    117:1162-1172.-   52. Romagnani S. T-cell subsets (Th1 versus Th2). Ann Allergy Asthma    Immunol. 2000; 85:9-18.-   53. Spellberg B, Edwards J E, Jr. Type 1/Type 2 immunity in    infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 32:76-102.-   54. Liu H, Jacobs B S, Liu J, et al. Interleukin-13 sensitivity and    receptor phenotypes of human glial cell lines: non-neoplastic glia    and low-grade astrocytoma differ from malignant glioma. Cancer    Immunol Immunother. 2000; 49:319-324.-   55. Debinski W, Gibo D M, Obiri N I, Kealiher A, Puri R K. Novel    anti-brain tumor cytotoxins specific for cancer cells. Nat    Biotechnol. 1998; 16:449-453.-   56. Debinski W, Gibo D M, Puri R K. Novel way to increase targeting    specificity to a human glioblastoma-associated receptor for    interleukin 13. Int J Cancer. 1998; 76:547-551-   57. Debinski W, Thompson J P. Retargeting interleukin 13 for    radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy of human high-grade    gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1999; 5:3143s-3147s.-   58. Thompson J P, Debinski W. Mutants of interleukin 13 with altered    reactivity toward interleukin 13 receptors. J Biol Chem. 1999;    274:29944-29950.-   59. Brooks W H, Netsky M G, Levine J E. Immunity and tumors of the    nervous system. Surg Neurol. 1975; 3:184-186.-   60. Bullard D E, Gillespie G Y, Mahaley M S, Bigner D D.    Immunobiology of human gliomas. Semin Oncol. 1986; 13:94-109.-   61. Coakham H B. Immunology of human brain tumors. Eur J Cancer Clin    Oncol. 1984; 20:145-149.-   62. Holladay F P, Heitz T, Wood G W. Antitumor activity against    established intracerebral gliomas exhibited by cytotoxic T    lymphocytes, but not by lymphokine-activated killer cells. J    Neurosurg. 1992; 77:757-762.-   63. Holladay F P, Heitz T, Chen Y L, Chiga M, Wood G W. Successful    treatment of a malignant rat glioma with cytotoxic T lymphocytes.    Neurosurgery. 1992; 31:528-533.-   64. Kruse C A, Lillehei K O, Mitchell D H, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters B,    Bellgrau D. Analysis of interleukin 2 and various effector cell    populations in adoptive immunotherapy of 9L rat gliosarcoma:    allogeneic cytotoxic T lymphocytes prevent tumor take. Proc Natl    Acad Sci USA. 1990; 87:9577-9581.-   65. Miyatake S, Nishihara K, Kikuchi H, et al. Efficient tumor    suppression by glioma-specific murine cytotoxic T lymphocytes    transfected with interferon-gamma gene. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;    82:217-220.-   66. Plautz G E, Touhalisky J E, Shu S. Treatment of murine gliomas    by adoptive transfer of ex vivo activated tumor-draining lymph node    cells. Cell Immunol. 1997; 178:101-107.-   67. Saris S C, Spiess P, Lieberman D M, Lin S, Walbridge S, Oldfield    E H. Treatment of murine primary brain tumors with systemic    interleukin-2 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Neurosurg. 1992;    76:513-519.-   68. Tzeng J J, Barth R F, Clendenon N R, Gordon W A. Adoptive    immunotherapy of a rat glioma using lymphokine-activated killer    cells and interleukin 2. Cancer Res. 1990; 50:4338-4343.-   69. Yamasaki T, Kikuchi H. An experimental approach to specific    adoptive immunotherapy for malignant brain tumors. Nippon Geka    Hokan. 1989; 58:485-492.-   70. Yamasaki T, Handa H, Yamashita J, Watanabe Y, Namba Y,    Hanaoka M. Specific adoptive immunotherapy with tumor-specific    cytotoxic T-lymphocyte clone for murine malignant gliomas. Cancer    Res. 1984; 44:1776-1783.-   71. Yamasaki T, Handa H, Yamashita J, Watanabe Y, Namba Y,    Hanaoka M. Specific adoptive immunotherapy of malignant glioma with    long-term cytotoxic T lymphocyte line expanded in T-cell growth    factor. Experimental study and future prospects. Neurosurg Rev.    1984; 7:37-54.-   72. Kikuchi K, Neuwelt E A. Presence of immunosuppressive factors in    brain-tumor cyst fluid. J Neurosurg. 1983; 59:790-799.-   73. Yamanaka R, Tanaka R, Yoshida S, Saitoh T, Fujita K, Naganuma H.    Suppression of TGF-beta1 in human gliomas by retroviral gene    transfection enhances susceptibility to LAK cells. J Neurooncol.    1999; 43:27-34.-   74. Kuppner M C, Hamou M F, Bodmer S, Fontana A, de Tribolet N. The    glioblastoma-derived T-cell suppressor factor/transforming growth    factor beta 2 inhibits the generation of lymphokine-activated killer    (LAK) cells. Int J Cancer. 1988; 42:562-567.-   75. Hayes R L. The cellular immunotherapy of primary brain tumors.    Rev Neurol (Paris). 1992; 148:454-466.-   76. Ingram M, Buckwalter J G, Jacques D B, et al. Immunotherapy for    recurrent malignant glioma: an interim report on survival. Neurol    Res. 1990; 12:265-273.-   77. Jaeckle K A. Immunotherapy of malignant gliomas. Semin Oncol.    1994; 21:249-259.-   78. Kruse C A, Cepeda L, Owens B, Johnson S D, Stears J, Lillehei    K O. Treatment of recurrent glioma with intracavitary alloreactive    cytotoxic T lymphocytes and interleukin-2. Cancer Immunol    Immunother. 1997; 45:77-87.-   79. Merchant R E, Baldwin N G, Rice C D, Bear H D. Adoptive    immunotherapy of malignant glioma using tumor-sensitized T    lymphocytes. Neurol Res. 1997; 19:145-152.-   80. Nakagawa K, Kamezaki T, Shibata Y, Tsunoda T, Meguro K, Nose T.    Effect of lymphokine-activated killer cells with or without    radiation therapy against malignant brain tumors. Neurol Med Chir    (Tokyo). 1995; 35:22-27.-   81. Plautz G E, Barnett G H, Miller D W, et al. Systemic T cell    adoptive immunotherapy of malignant gliomas. J Neurosurg. 1998;    89:42-51.-   82. Sankhla S K, Nadkarni J S, Bhagwati S N. Adoptive immunotherapy    using lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells and interleukin-2 for    recurrent malignant primary brain tumors. J Neurooncol. 1996;    27:133-140.-   83. Sawamura Y, de Tribolet N. Immunotherapy of brain tumors. J    Neurosurg Sci. 1990; 34:265-278.-   84. Thomas C, Schober R, Lenard H G, Lumenta C B, Jacques D B,    Wechsler W. Immunotherapy with stimulated autologous lymphocytes in    a case of a juvenile anaplastic glioma. Neuropediatrics. 1992;    23:123-125.-   85. Tsurushima H, Liu S Q, Tuboi K, et al. Reduction of end-stage    malignant glioma by injection with autologous cytotoxic T    lymphocytes. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999; 90:536-545.-   86. Barba D, Saris S C, Holder C, Rosenberg S A, Oldfield E H.    Intratumoral LAK cell and interleukin-2 therapy of human gliomas. J    Neurosurg. 1989; 70:175-182.-   87. Hayes R L, Koslow M, Hiesiger E M, et al. Improved long term    survival after intracavitary interleukin-2 and lymphokine-activated    killer cells for adults with recurrent malignant glioma. Cancer.    1995; 76:840-852.-   88. Ingram M, Jacques S, Freshwater D B, Techy G B, Shelden C H,    Helsper J T. Salvage immunotherapy of malignant glioma. Arch Surg.    1987; 122:1483-1486.-   89. Jacobs S K, Wilson D J, Kornblith P L, Grimm E A. Interleukin-2    or autologous lymphokine-activated killer cell treatment of    malignant glioma: phase I trial. Cancer Res. 1986; 46:2101-2104.-   90. Jeffes E W, III, Beamer Y B, Jacques S, et al. Therapy of    recurrent high-grade gliomas with surgery, autologous    mitogen-activated IL-2-stimulated (MAK) killer lymphocytes, and    rIL-2: II. Correlation of survival with MAK cell tumor necrosis    factor production in vitro. Lymphokine Cytokine Res. 1991; 10:89-94.-   91. Merchant R E, McVicar D W, Merchant L H, Young H F. Treatment of    recurrent malignant glioma by repeated intracerebral injections of    human recombinant interleukin-2 alone or in combination with    systemic interferon-alpha. Results of a phase I clinical trial. J    Neurooncol. 1992; 12:75-83.-   92. Yoshida S, Takai N, Saito T, Tanaka R. Adoptive immunotherapy in    patients with malignant glioma. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1987;    14:1930-1932.-   93. Davico B L, De Monte L B, Spagnoli G C, et al. Bispecific    monoclonal antibody anti-CD3×anti-tenascin: an immunotherapeutic    agent for human glioma. Int J Cancer. 1995; 61:509-515.-   94. Jung G, Brandi M, Eisner W, et al. Local immunotherapy of glioma    patients with a combination of 2 bispecific antibody fragments and    resting autologous lymphocytes: evidence for in situ t-cell    activation and therapeutic efficacy. Int J Cancer. 2001; 91:225-230.-   95. Pfosser A, Brandi M, Salih H, Grosse-Hovest L, Jung G. Role of    target antigen in bispecific-antibody-mediated killing of human    glioblastoma cells: a pre-clinical study. Int J Cancer. 1999;    80:612-616.-   96. Yoshida J, Takaoka T, Mizuno M, Momota H, Okada H. Cytolysis of    malignant glioma cells by lymphokine-activated killer cells combined    with anti-CD3/antiglioma bifunctional antibody and tumor necrosis    factor-alpha. J Surg Oncol. 1996; 62:177-182.-   97. Imaizumi T, Kuramoto T, Matsunaga K, et al. Expression of the    tumor-rejection antigen SART1 in brain tumors. Int J Cancer. 1999;    83:760-764.-   98. Eshhar Z, Waks T, Gross G, Schindler D G. Specific activation    and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single    chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta    subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad    Sci USA. 1993; 90:720-724.-   99. Haynes N M, Snook M B, Trapani J A, et al. Redirecting mouse CTL    against colon carcinoma: superior signaling efficacy of single-chain    variable domain chimeras containing TCR-zeta vs Fc epsilon RI-gamma.    J Immunol. 2001; 166:182-187.-   100. Hombach A, Heuser C, Sircar R, et al. An anti-CD30 chimeric    receptor that mediates CD3-zeta-independent T-cell activation    against Hodgkin's lymphoma cells in the presence of soluble CD30.    Cancer Res. 1998; 58:1116-1119.-   101. Hombach A, Schneider C, Sent D, et al. An entirely humanized    CD3 zeta-chain signaling receptor that directs peripheral blood t    cells to specific lysis of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive tumor    cells. Int J Cancer. 2000; 88:115-120.-   102. Hombach A, Sircar R, Heuser C, et al. Chimeric anti-TAG72    receptors with immunoglobulin constant Fc domains and gamma or zeta    signalling chains. Int J Mol Med. 1998; 2:99-103.-   103. Moritz D, Wets W, Mattern J, Groner B. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes    with a grafted recognition specificity for ERBB2-expressing tumor    cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:4318-4322.-   104. Weijtens M E, Willemsen R A, Valerio D, Stam K, Bolhuis R L.    Single chain Ig/gamma gene-redirected human T lymphocytes produce    cytokines, specifically lyse tumor cells, and recycle lytic    capacity. J Immunol. 1996; 157:836-843.-   105. Altenschmidt U, Klundt E, Groner B. Adoptive transfer of in    vitro-targeted, activated T lymphocytes results in total tumor    regression. J Immunol. 1997; 159:5509-5515.-   106. Jensen M, Tan G, Forman S, Wu A M, Raubitschek A. CD20 is a    molecular target for scFvFc:zeta receptor redirected T cells:    implications for cellular immunotherapy of CD20+ malignancy. Biol    Blood Marrow Transplant. 1998; 4:75-83.-   107. Jensen M C, Clarke P, Tan G, et al. Human T lymphocyte genetic    modification with naked DNA. Mol Ther. 2000; 1:49-55.-   108. Minty A, Chalon P, Derocq J M, et al. Interleukin-13 is a new    human lymphokine regulating inflammatory and immune responses.    Nature. 1993; 362:248-250.-   109. Boon T, Cerottini J C, Van den E B, van der B P, Van Pel A.    Tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;    12:337-365.-   110. Castelli C, Rivoltini L, Andreola G, Carrabba M, Renkvist N,    Parmiani G. T-cell recognition of melanoma-associated antigens. J    Cell Physiol. 2000; 182:323-331.-   111. Chi D D, Merchant R E, Rand R, et al. Molecular detection of    tumor-associated antigens shared by human cutaneous melanomas and    gliomas. Am J Pathol. 1997; 150:2143-2152.-   112. Boon T, Coulie P, Marchand M, Weynants P, Wolfel T, Brichard V.    Genes coding for tumor rejection antigens: perspectives for specific    immunotherapy. Important Adv Oncol. 1994; 53-69.-   113. Cebon J, MacGregor D, Scott A, DeBoer R. Immunotherapy of    melanoma: targeting defined antigens. Australas J Dermatol. 1997; 38    Suppl 1:S66-S72.-   114. Greenberg P D, Riddell S R. Tumor-specific T-cell immunity:    ready for prime time? J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992; 84:1059-1061.-   115. Cohen J L, Saron M F, Boyer O, et al. Preservation of    graft-versus-infection effects after suicide gene therapy for    prevention of graft-versus-host disease. Hum Gene Ther. 2000;    11:2473-2481.-   116. Drobyski W R, Morse H C, III, Burns W H, Casper J T,    Sandford G. Protection from lethal murine graft-versus-host disease    without compromise of alloengraftment using transgenic donor T cells    expressing a thymidine kinase suicide gene. Blood. 2001;    97:2506-2513.-   117. Link C J, Jr., Traynor A, Seregina T, Burt R K. Adoptive    immunotherapy for leukemia: donor lymphocytes transduced with the    herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene. Cancer Treat Res. 1999;    101:369-375.-   118. Spencer D M. Developments in suicide genes for preclinical and    clinical applications. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2000; 2:433-440.

1. A chimeric immunoreceptor encoded by a nucleic acid sequencecomprising SEQ ID NO:23.
 2. A vector which comprises a nucleic acidcomprising SEQ ID NO:23.
 3. A nucleic acid sequence comprising SEQ IDNO:23.
 4. The nucleic acid sequence of claim 3 which consistsessentially of SEQ ID NO:23.